Panel 1



You love the Internet and want to protect human rights. I can help.

I’ve dedicated my legal career to making an impact at the intersection of technology law and policy, the Internet, human rights, and civil liberties. This has meant my practice is interdisciplinary and cuts across (tele)communications, privacy, intellectual property, copyright, technology, and human rights law. Much of my work involves legal and policy reform in addition to practicing law, so I spend as much time thinking about what our laws could or should be, as I do about what they currently are and how we can use them to solve problems unique to the digital age.

As of June 2021, I work full-time at the Center on Privacy & Technology at Georgetown Law in Washington, DC, where I am a Senior Associate. This website will continue to be updated and serve as a central record of my work and activities. Tekhnos Law is no longer accepting new clients, pending further notice (if any); however, I remain an active member of the Ontario bar and exceptions may be made on a case-by-case basis. 

I have extensive experience representing clients in proceedings before the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC), and have represented clients as interveners before the Supreme Court of Canada. I regularly research and write policy submissions to government consultations and advise on legal, policy, advocacy, and campaign strategies. I also speak at conferences and workshops; deliver presentations, seminars, and talks; meet with politicians and government officials on behalf of clients; and provide commentary in print and broadcast media on behalf of clients or as a subject matter expert.

Since 2018, I have been engaged as a Research Fellow at the Citizen Lab (Munk School of Global Affairs & Public Policy, University of Toronto), an interdisciplinary research laboratory that focuses on the intersection of information and communications technologies, human rights, and global security. My research areas at the Lab have included consumer spyware or “stalkerware” and the human rights implications of algorithmic decision-making.

In April 2021, I completed a research grant by the Women’s Legal Education and Action Fund (LEAF), resulting in the publication of the landmark report, Deplatforming Misogyny: Report on Platform Liability for Technology-Facilitated Gender-Based Violence (PDF). The report provides recommendations for legislative and other reforms, and will inform LEAF’s future litigation and legal reform strategy concerning technology-facilitate gender-based violence, abuse, and harassment (TFGBV). 

I am called to the Bar of Ontario and am a licensed member of the Law Society of Ontario, with a J.D. from the University of Victoria and B.A. (Honours English) from the University of British Columbia. This included exchange semesters at Université Jean-Moulin Lyon III and the National University of Singapore, Faculty of Law (NUS Law). I also hold an LL.M. (Concentration in Law and Technology) from the University of Ottawa, during which I specialized in online platform regulation and platform liability for harms to marginalized communities.  My paper based on this work was delivered at We Robot 2020, the leading international conference on law and policy relating to robotics and artificial intelligence, where I received the inaugural Ian R. Kerr Robotnik Memorial Award for the Best Paper by an Emerging Scholar.

I serve on the Board of Directors of Open Privacy, completed a technology law internship at the Samuelson-Glushko Canadian Internet Policy and Public Interest Clinic (CIPPIC), where I worked on cases as a research student and junior counsel, and completed the Annenberg-Oxford Media Policy Summer Institute (2017) at Oxford University. 

My job is to help you advance your cause, achieve impact on an issue you care about, or otherwise bring the world that much closer to your vision for it. If you have questions or would like to connect, then get in touch! I look forward to seeing what we can make happen.

Panel 2



Google Inc. v. Equustek Solutions Inc., 2017 SCC 34 (Supreme Court of Canada): I represented an intervener as co-counsel and agent in this case, involving Google being ordered to globally de-index all links to the defendant’s websites around the world.

We argued that the Court should develop and apply a legal test for online content takedown, that respected freedom of expression under section 2(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and tried to establish that the Internet is a protected medium of communications. (My observations from the hearing here.)

TELUS Communications Inc. v. Avraham Wellman, 2019 SCC 19 (Supreme Court of Canada): I represented an intervener as junior counsel, co-authoring the factum and appearing at hearing as second chair, in a case about whether or not mandatory arbitration clauses in contracts of adhesion should apply to small businesses in Ontario. 

We argued that in context of the radical marketplace shifts resulting from a digitized society, many small businesses such as sole proprietors, freelancers, prosumers“, and gig economy workers effectively operate with a similar lack of commercial and legal sophistication as average consumers, and thus should be similarly protected in disputes with much larger corporations. (Twitter summary here.)

Uber Technologies Inc., et al. v. David Heller (Supreme Court of Canada, File no. 38534): I represented an intervener as junior counsel and co-authored the factum, in a class action case about whether or not Uber drivers were bound by non-negotiable standard-form arbitration clauses in their terms of service with Uber (which would have required drivers to individually arbitrate claims in the Netherlands). 

We argued that forced arbitration clauses in contractual relationships of asymmetrical power were invalid on grounds of unconscionability, and that access-to-justice considerations militated against staying the class action and forcing vulnerable “gig economy” workers to arbitrate claims on their own in the Netherlands (including being responsible at the outset for their own travel, arbitration, and legal expenses). 


During the first several years of my career, I was involved in every major telecommunications proceeding implicating the public interest, that arose at the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC). This includes the following in particular:

Proceeding: Examination of differential pricing practices related to Internet data plans (Telecom Notice of Consultation 2016-192)
The Story: The net neutrality /zero-rating one.” Bell Mobility favoured its own mobile video app by not charging for data to use it (vs. charging for data to watch Netflix)–a.k.a. zero-rating. The CRTC said this violated net neutrality. Videotron zero-rated music from certain commercial music streaming apps. The CRTC launched a general proceeding on the legitimacy of zero-rating in Canadian telecommunications law. Client’s goal: ensure the CRTC upheld net neutrality and banned discriminatory zero-rating practices as illegal. (Spoiler: we won.)
Key Issues: net neutrality, zero-rating, Internet competition and choice, innovation

Proceeding: Review of basic telecommunications services (Telecom Notice of Consultation 2015-134)
The Story: Plain old telephone is legally considered a basic telecommunications service in Canada. Broadband
Internet access should be a basic service, too. (The CRTC agreed.)
Key Issues: broadband Internet, basic service, universal service objective, universal access, broadband affordability, Internet affordability

Proceeding: Development of the Commission’s broadband funding regime (Telecom Notice of Consultation 2017-112)
The Story: The CRTC had to decide how to allocate $750 million to roll out new broadband networks across Canada. My client’s goal was to
ensure this public funding went towards community, non-profit, Indigenous, and municipal broadband initiatives–and not to large, commercial Internet service providers who already ruled the market. 
Key Issues: broadband Internet affordability, community broadband, rural broadband, broadband competition and choice 

Proceeding: Reconsideration of Telecom Decision 2017-56 regarding final terms and conditions for wholesale mobile wireless roaming service (Telecom Notice of Consultation 2017-259)
The Story: Sugar Mobile sold ultra-cheap mobile phone and data plans using a workaround in Ice Wireless’s roaming agreement with Rogers. The CRTC said this wasn’t allowed. The federal Minister of Innovation, Science, and Economic Development returned the decision to CRTC and told them to reconsider. Client’s goal: persuade CRTC to order national carriers to
open up mobile wireless networks to independent competition.  
Key Issues: mobile virtual network operators (MVNOs), WiFi-first MVNOs, mobile wireless competition, mobile wireless affordability

Proceeding: Review of wholesale services and associated policies (Telecom Notice of Consultation 2015-551) 
The Story: 
Fibre is the future of the Internet–not DSL, copper, or non-hybrid coaxial cables. Canada’s largest Internet service providers had a legacy head start on fibre networks and could price out the competition from independent ISPs for good, unless the CRTC ordered them to provide wholesale access to fibre (FTTP) networks on fair terms. Fortunately, the CRTC did (kind of).
Key Issues: FTTP (fibre-to-the-premises) broadband Internet, Internet access competition and choice, independent service providers, wholesale service policies

Proceeding: Review of the Wireless Code (Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2016-293)
The Story: The Wireless Code provides consumer protection in buying cell phones and  mobile wireless plans. The CRTC created it in 2013 and launched this proceeding to evaluate its performance. Client’s goal: update the Wireless Code to close demonstrated loopholes, strengthen consumers’ rights, and ensure effective enforcement. 
Key Issues: consumer protection, mobile wireless competition, mobile wireless sales practices, device unlocking, data caps, contract terms, consumer rights, innovation


In addition to representing clients in formal legal proceedings, I have written briefs and submissions to various government consultations and parliamentary committees on a range of issues, including digital trade, privacy, intellectual property and copyright reform, Internet affordability, and the importance of public interest advocacy:

Submission to the Ministry of Government and Consumer Services Consultation: Strengthening Privacy Protections in Ontario (coordinated and co-authored submission by the Citizen Lab)

Brief to the House of Commons Standing Committee on International Trade:
Priorities of Canadian Stakeholders Having an Interest in Bilateral and Trilateral Trade in North America, Between Canada, United States and Mexico, specifically regarding
North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), copyright, and digital trade (more information)

Submission to Canadian Heritage consultation:
Canadian Content in a Digital World (more information)

Submission to Standing Committee on Alberta´s Economic Future:
Review of the Personal Information Protection Act (more information)

Submission to the Federal Court of Appeal and Federal Court Rules Committee:
Review of the Rule on Costs (more information)

Submission to Ministry of Innovation, Science, and Economic Development (Industry Canada):
Bell Canada’s Petition to the Governor in Council to Vary Telecom Regulatory Policy CRTC 2015-326, Review of wholesale wireline services and associated policies (more information)

Panel 3



Cynthia Khoo, “Deplatforming Misogyny: Report on Platform Liability for Technology-Facilitated Gender-Based Violence” (PDF), Women’s Legal Education and Action Fund (LEAF), April 2021.

Kate Robertson, Cynthia Khoo, and Yolanda Song, To Surveil and Predict: A Human Rights Analysis of Algorithmic Policing in Canada” (PDF), The Citizen Lab, University of Toronto, September 2020.

Adrian Fong, Cynthia Khoo, Christopher Parsons, and Masashi Crete-Nishihata, Access My Info: A Guide to Developing and Deploying the Access My Info Research Project” (Project Website), The Citizen Lab, University of Toronto, October 2019.

Cynthia Khoo, Kate Robertson, and Ronald Deibert, “Installing Fear: A Canadian Legal and Policy Analysis of Using, Developing, and Selling Smartphone Spyware and Stalkerware Applications” (PDF), Citizen Lab Research Report No. 120, University of Toronto, June 2019.

Christopher Parsons, Adam Molnar, Jakub Dalek, Jeffrey Knockel, Miles Kenyon, Bennett Haselton, Cynthia Khoo, Ron Deibert, “The Predator in Your Pocket: A Multidisciplinary Assessment of the Stalkerware Application Industry” (PDF), Citizen Lab Research Report No. 119, University of Toronto, June 2019.


Missing the Unintended Forest despite the Deliberately Planted Trees: Reasonable Foreseeability and Legal Recognition of Platform Algorithm- Facilitated Emergent Systemic Harm to Marginalized Communities
Delivered at We Robot 2020. Recipient of the Ian R. Kerr Robotnik Memorial Award for the Best Paper by an Emerging Scholar.

‘To Be’ Is A Verb: Rewriting Law Through Embodied Reform
Windsor Review of Legal and Social Issues: Digital Companion2014. Recipient of the JSD Tory Writing Award for Best Conference Paper.


Protecting against online gender-based violence and harassment
Toronto Star, co-authored with Pam Hrick and Rosel Kim (April 2021)

Where is the consent of the algorithmically policed?” 
The Monitor, Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives (September 2020)

CUSMA: No one-size solution to platform liability” (full issue)
The Monitor, Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives (July 2020)

When artificial intelligence becomes artificial intimacy” 
The Monitor, Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives (May 2020)

Trust Abhors a Vacuum” 
The Monitor, Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives (September 2019)

Where the silicon hits the 49th” 
The Monitor, Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives (December 2018)

The Sum of All Attention” (page 11)
The Monitor, Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives (Sept/Oct 2018)

The revolution will not be automated
Asserting a place for labour within the technosocial gestalt 
The Monitor, Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives (July/August 2018)

Crafting Internet policy with nuance, not kneejerks
How can we revisit the idea of ‘Internet exceptionalism’ when crafting policies and laws, without sacrificing what made the Internet exceptional?

Policy Options, Institute for Research on Public Policy (May 2018)

The Ghost Investor
The Monitor, Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives (March/April 2018)

Dramatis Principiis” (page 31)
The Monitor, Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives (January/February 2018)

Google v. Equustek at the Supreme Court of Canada: Dispatch from the hearing,” (January 2017)

Hope Springs Municipal: How small towns are driving Canada’s digital future
The Monitor, Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives (March 2015)

Writing for IPilogue at IPOsgoode:

Panel 4

Media & Speaking


National Post (Anja Karadeglija, 25 August 2021)
Pervasive role of algorithms in daily life raises concerns over need for government oversight

Law Bytes (Podcast) (Michael Geist, 23 August 2021)
‘They Just Seemed Not to Listen to Any of Us’ — Cynthia Khoo on the Canadian Government’s Online Harms Consultation

Lawyer’s Daily (Donalee Moulton, 4 June 2021)
LEAF calls on feds to hold companies accountable for online violence

CBA National (Brigitte Pellerin, 13 May 2021)
Deplatforming Misogyny

CBA National (Dale Smith, 5 May 2021)
Careful when regulating web giants as broadcasters

Wire Report (Jenna Cocullo, 30 April 2021)
Regulator needed to deal with tech-facilitated gender violence: report(paywalled)

Canadian Lawyer (Zena Olijnyk, 28 April 2021)
Federal legal reform needed to protect women and marginalized groups from abuse on digital platforms

The Tyee (Bryan Carnee, 23 November 2020)
RCMP Confirms It Bought a Tool that ‘Unlocks’ Hidden Facebook Friends

The Agenda with Steve Paikin (Jeyan Jeganathan, 29 September 2020)
Algorithmic Policing” (YouTube)

This Matters (Podcast, Toronto Star) (Raju Mudhar, 15 September 2020)
The ABC’s (algorithms, big tech and cops) of predictive policing and surveillance

National Post (Canadian Press) (Michelle McQuigge, 1 September 2020)
Minority report? How police in Canada are already using technology to predict future crimes

The Tyee (Bryan Carney, 1 September 2020)
Report Calls for Moratorium on Police Use of AI to Predict Crimes

The Logic (Murad Hemmadi, 1 September 2020)
Research group calls for pause on emerging use of algorithmic policing in Canada

Lawyer’s Daily (John Schofield, 1 September 2020)
Report warns against increasing use of algorithmic policing technology (Justin Ling, 25 October 2019)
Palantir’s big push into Canada

Vancouver Sun (Michelle McQuigge, 2 October 2019)
Toronto’s Pearson airport to use Vancouver company’s AI-powered technology to detect weapons

ELLE Canada (Wing Sze Tang, 2 October 2019)
Is Your Smartphone Spying on You?

The Wire Report (Anja Karadeglija, 17 September 2019)
Green Party platform: no anonymous social media, 5G rollout on hold (The Engine Room) (Lorraine Chuen, 4 September 2019)
Addressing stalkerware and gender-based abuse through data protection law

Financial Times (Camilla Hodgson, 18 July 2019)
Inside the secretive world of stalking apps

The Lawyer’s Daily (Amanda Jerome, 13 June 2019)
Knowledge gaps regarding spyware used for abuse need to be addressed, researcher says”

Toronto Star (Kate Allen, 12 June 2019)
Legal gaps allow cellphone ‘stalkerware’ to thrive, researchers say

Maclean’s (Shannon Proudfoot, 26 September 2018)
What happens when artificial intelligence comes to Ottawa

Canadian Lawyer (Aidan Macnab, 26 September 2018)
“Report says use of AI could be violating human rights

Toronto Star (Nicholas Keung, 26 September 2018)
“Researchers raise alarm over use of artificial intelligence in immigration and refugee decision-making

Beyond the Headlines (Podcast) (Jasper Parades, Mary Shin, Tom Piezkarski, Ian T. D. Thomson, 20 April 2018)
Net Neutrality in the Canadian Context

Business Insider (Rob Price, 7 April 2018)
Facebook’s plan to let users ‘unsend’ messages could boost harassment and bullying, experts warn

Yahoo Canada News (Elisabetta Bianchini, 27 November 2017)
What Canadians need to know about net neutrality

MobileSyrup (Rose Behar & Sameer Chhabra, 29 November 2017)
Here’s everything you need to know about Canada’s unlocking fee ban

Tiffany Sostar (Tiffany Sostar, 12 November 2017)
Digital Self-Care: An Interview with Cynthia Khoo” 

Law Times (Michael McKiernan, 12 June 2017)
Focus: U.S.and Canada diverge on net neutrality” 

TRT World (18 May 2017)
The Newsmakers: Net Neutrality” 

IT World Canada (Eric Emin Wood, 24 April 2017)
Could CRTC ruling against zero-rating be a boon for ISPs and businesses?” 

Via Satellite (Juliet Van Wagenen, 18 January 2017)
Canada on Path to Provide High Speed Internet to All” 

Forbes (Katheryn Thayer, 17 October 2014)
Secrecy-Shrouded TPP Leaks Alarm Internet Freedom Advocates” 

Redeye, Vancouver Co-op Radio, CFRO 100.5FM (26 July 2014)
Free Access To Online Information Under Threat From TPP” 


Deplatforming Misogyny (Panel, co-hosted by The eQuality Project at University of Ottawa Faculty of Law, Institute for Feminist Legal Studies at Osgoode Hall Law School, and University of Ottawa Centre for Law, Technology and Society, 28 April 2021)

The Technology and Structural Inequality Series: Policing and Technology (Panel, Center for the Study of Race and Ethnicity in America, co-hosted with Computing for the People Project, Department of Computer Science, Brown University, 10 March 2021)

Police Surveillance Technology and the Transformation of Public Space (Panel, Munk School of Global Affairs & Public Policy, University of Toronto, 17 November 2020)

Algorithmic Policing and Surveillance in Canada: The Defining Role of Reliability, Necessity and Proportionality in 21st-Century Oversight (Presentation and seminar delivered as part of the Queen’s University Surveillance Studies Centre Seminar Series, Kingston, ON / Virtually, 11 November 2020)

Digital Platforms and Violence against Women: User Experiences, Best Practices, and the Law (Video) (Webinar, Centre for Research & Education on Violence Against Women & Children, 20 October 2020)

Algorithmic Policing and the Canadian Charter (Video) (Public talk delivered as part of uOttawa Centre for Law, Technology and Society #CLTSVirtualTalk Series, 7 October 2020)

To Surveil and Predict: A Human Rights Analysis of Algorithmic Policing in Canada (Video) (Public talk delivered as part of Ethics of AI in Context speaker series, Centre for Ethics at University of Toronto, 5 October 2020)

Algorithmic Policing and the Art of the (Constitutionally?) Probable (Guest lecture presented at “Technology and the Chartercourse by Lex Gill, at McGill University Faculty of Law, 21 July 2020)

Law Reform Approaches to Technology-Facilitated Gender-Based Violence and Abuse (Webinar panel for the Canadian Bar Association and Women’s Legal Education and Action Fund [LEAF], 16 July 2020)

The Unimportance of Being Unintended: Digital Platform Harms and Reasonable Foreseeability (Video) (Slide Deck) (Public talk delivered as part of uOttawa Centre for Law, Technology and Society #CLTSVirtualTalk Series, 3 June 2020)

Stalkerware 101: What You Need to Know (Presentation delivered at the 7th Annual Gathering of Family Court Support Workers in Toronto, ON, 2 October 2019)

Uninstalling Fear: What can the law do about stalkerware surveillance and abuse? (Presentation and seminar delivered as part of the Queen’s University Surveillance Studies Centre Seminar Series, Kingston, ON, 25 September 2019)

TELUS v. Wellman: Consumer Rights, Class Action, and Access to Justice at the Supreme Court of Canada (Post-hearing panel discussion with counsel from various parties, University of Ottawa, 6 November 2018)

AI and Decision-Making: Basics, policy, application, and GoC perspectives (Panelist, Ottawa Law & Technology Meetup, Shopify, 1 November 2018)

Convergence, Competition and Common Carriage in the Review of the Telecommunications Act and Broadcasting Act (Panelist, Media Industries and Network Society course by Dr. Dwayne Winseck at Carleton University, 4 October 2018)

Shooting the Messenger? Intermediary Liability & Harmful Online Speech (Panelist, McGill University Faculty of Law, 14 March 2018)

Canadian International Law Students Conference 2018: International Cyber Law Panel (Panelist, Osgoode Hall Law School and University of Toronto Faculty of Law, 9 March 2018)


Against Platform Determinism (3 March 2021)

  • Draft paper accepted for peer workshopping: “All Posts Aren’t Created Equal: A Call for Substantive Equality in Platform Content Moderation”

We Robot (22-25 September 2020)

Citizen Lab Summer Institute (31 July – 1 August 2019)

Automated Decision-Making in the Criminal Justice System (22 May 2019)

  • Current and Potential Uses of AI in Criminal Law in Canada (Moderator)
  • Predictive Policing: Exploring the Tough Questions (Workshop Facilitator)

RightsCon Toronto (16-18 May 2018)

BEA2018: Annual Convention of Broadcast Education Association (7 April 2018)

RightsCon Brussels (29-31 May 2017)

  • Making Facebook Pay (for the News) (lightning talk)
  • Choosing Your Battle (Terrain): Digital Rights Advocacy and Capturing the Grounds of Debate (workshop)
  • The Digital is the Political: Anti-Oppression Resistance and an Introduction to Migrant Rights for Digital Advocates (roundtable)
  • Net Neutrality Planet: What’s Next in the Global Fight for an Open Internet (panel)

Future of First Nations, Inuit, and Métis Broadcasting (16 June 2017)

  • CRTC Interventions 101: A Nuts-and-Bolts Workshop on All the Logistical Details You Never Wanted (But Need) to Know (Slide Deck)

Annenberg-Oxford Media Policy Summer Institute (July 2017)

  • Loss in the Time of Convergence: A Tale of Media Woes and Internet Foes (Or: How to Save News Media without Breaking the Internet)
Panel 5



You have likely landed here for a reason, so let’s talk! Feel free to email or fill out the contact form below, and I look forward to hearing from you.

Note: Please avoid sending sensitive information through this form if possible, as Tekhnos Law cannot guarantee the security of this channel.